Hoffer’s Working And Thinking On The Waterfront: Preface
Below I will write out the two-page Preface of Eric Hoffer’s book, Eric Hoffer:Working and Thinking on the Waterfront, A Journal: June, 1958—May 1959, and will comment on it.
Here is the Preface: Page ix:(H for Hoffer writing after this): “While rummaging recently through a pile of old notebooks, I came upon a diary I had kept during 1958-1959. I had completely forgotten about it. Nineteen fifty-eight and 1959 were difficult years. I was trying to write a book on the intellectuals, the ‘men of words.” Since it was not going to be a scholarly history, it soon became clear that my theories and insights would not come to more than forty pages of manuscript—enough for a chapter but not for a book. Obviously, the intellectual would have to be part of a larger project. I began to suspect that all my thinking life I had probably only one train of thought, that everything I had written stemmed from a central preoccupation, and that I might go through life and never discover what it was.
I had to sort things out; talk to somebody. So on June 1, 1958, I began a diary.”
My response: Eric Hoffer, great soul, profound loner and brilliant philosopher, needed to get outside of his own solipsistic, stoic, solitary bubble, and talk to someone wiser and learned to help him uncover and discover his main theme, his one train of thought.
But being a radically individualistic loner, there may have been no one to talk to on his level of development, so he wrote his journal so, in a way, it would talk back to him and get him moving on discovering his grand theme, his primary train of thought, and this literary mechanism, writing his journal, was an intellectual exercise which seemed to serve as an objective “friend”, a sounding board so that he could discover what he was writing about in which may have been his greatest book to come, that he was writing just then, The Ordeal of Change.
H: “Toward the end of March, 1959, I realized my central subject was change. I knew I would have to write two small books: one on change in the backward countries and one on change in general.”
My response: I will not comment much here as I have explained my interpretation of his emphasis that change is his primary theme or cultural metanarrative. Change for Hoffer is also a historical-ontological force or phenomenon because it puts constant pressure on all to adjust and adapt to fit in any longer, and the pressure on their self-esteem is massive and often unbearable. Natural, supernatural, cultural and societal change grinds down those of little self-esteem and the results are menacing for people ill-prepared to cope with it.
H: “The diary filled seven notebooks. The entry on the last pages of the seventh notebook was for May 21, 1959. I cannot remember what decided me not to go on with the diary. I did not start another notebook.
It is perhaps not out of place to state here plainly what I mean by intellectuals. They are people who feel themselves members of the educated minority, with a God-given right to direct and shape events. An intellectual need not be well educated or particularly intelligent. What counts is a feeling of being a member of an educated elite.”
My response: The intellectuals feel they are elite and superior to the masses. They feel they should direct people, acquiring and centralizing the power of powerlessness unto themselves. People are insecure so they are addicted to gaining social power and status, and that drive corrupts all touched by their power lust.
H: “An intellectual wants to be listened to. He wants to instruct and be taken seriously. It is more important for him to be important than be free. He would rather be persecuted than be ignored. Typical intellectuals feel oppressed in a democratic society where they are left alone to do as they please. They call it jester’s license, and they envy intellectuals in Communist countries that take intellectuals seriously.”
My response: The only cure for the power sickness that rots out the heart and soul of most intellectuals is to empower the masses to run things, as they will force to government to leave them be free and alone to do as they will within reason, within spiritual, moral and legals boundaries.
With the masses as liberated and liberating individuators, these supercitizens will transform society to operate by the power of powerfulness mode of power handling.