I have long known that the better individuals behave, proportionately reduced--or should be proportionately reduced--is the number and reach of external laws and rule required to govern human behavior, maintaining law and order, and for operating a quiet, smoothly operating community.
Let us be skeptical and practical? It is all fine and good to assume that the better individuals behave, then the more anarchist society can function well as. If that is so, why are we not living that way anywhere right now? We have not encountered successful anarchist states because a politically, artificially, carefully constructed political system has never been crafted before, let alone constitutionally written down to given the masses guidance and assurance of legal sanction and protection.
Once such a political theory is formulated (I am sort of working on it but am not there yet.), it will work well if carefully implemented and revised as needed.
Also, what primitive forms of individualism existing and practiced today have given individuating a bad name. Once the Mavellonialist way is installed in a community, province or country, then individuals will be trained up and experienced at running a society based in anarchist liberty.
No comments:
Post a Comment