Kim Davis Is Fighting Back

Kim Davis is sticking to her guns, and fighting for her and our constitutional rights. Go, Kim, go!.

My nephew printed some article on Facebook that chided her for her costly and wasteful theater, and urged us just to move on and go with the gay flow, now that gay marriage is the law of the land.

The article asserted that it is their human right.

Acutally, I see it differently. Gays already have numerous human rights and protected class protections, and that is as it should be. No conservatives seek to reverse those. Gays have been granted almost all that they want, most of what they need, and more than they deserve.

If they want civil unions, fine. If they want to be married, that is a violation of natural law, of Christian and Mavellonialist ethics, and it a violation of the Constitution.

The Constitution recognizes that traditional marriage is the only legally binding form of marriage. It is a divinely sanctioned contract and sacrament between members of the opposite sex.

The Founding Fathers allowed this protection for traditional marriage because they realized that society requires that girls and boys need a married Mom and Dad to be brought up right, to serve God, the nation, civilization and the conduct themselves properly.

Boys must be boys and girls must be girls. These are the citizens of tomorrow that champion the American Way, and preserve our best and most superior  way of life.

To bring up children as lawful anarchists and individuated supercitizens that will run this constitutional republic tomorrow and in the future, these children are best nurtured in a wise, moral, stable, gender-emphasizing, loving and intact family structure, arising from the parents being married first.

The human right most basic and elemental is the right to live and flourish as a minority of one. To live and shoulder one's responsibilities as a citizen entails that society allow each individual to reach her utmost potential as a child of God. Orienting from a traditional married couple is the singular and best route for training and inspiring this success of tomorrow.

For this reason, the human rights of the yet unborn individuators of the future, not yet born or aborted, not raised by artificially married gay parents, or whatever marginal married union that extremists can dream up or imagine, take precedent over all other important but subordinate rights.

I find fault with the gay marriage law because it violates the human right that each American of tomorrow is potentially blocked from gaining, having not been reared in a traditional marriage setting, bu traditional parents.

With this in mind, the godless, sinful, unnatural, diabolic, sick, fruitless law legalizing gay marriage must be reversed and cast down to hell from whence it was conceived.