A liberal lawyer would offer that there can be reasonable, legal and constitutional laws passed limiting and regulating our civil liberties because our civil liberty rights were never meant to be and cannot be an absolute right. For example, we enjoy great freedom of speech, but not the right to slander or yell fire in a crowded theater, or threaten to murder someone.
My take on this as an anarchist individuator is that the moderate response is that the right to enjoy these civil liberties is near absolute, if not literally absolute. Since the state, with organized violence and curbing of private behavior, is the leading source of suppressing civil liberties and natural rights, it is best to keep government small, and the restrictions on one's near absolute power to exercise one's civil liberties, like the right to own and bear arms, to an absolute minimum.
With that in mind, we will not ban bump stocks, and not raise the age of purchasing gun to 21, or expand background checks, etc. Sorry, Trump, do not go RINO and begin the incremental slippery slope towards gun control by siding with Chuck and Nancy.
Side the the National Association of Gun Rights, Mr. Trump, and do not give the Left an opening to grab guns.
No comments:
Post a Comment