Today, 8-11-2014, on Facebook, my NRA entry carried this article by Kaitlyn, a fine piece of reporting. Any points he makes, I am quoting directly from her article, but am paraphrasing them in general words of my own.
Her article is on philosophy professor Jack Russell Weinstein. Weinstein seems to be a gun-control enthusiast. I would like a chance to refute his points, as a gun-rights activist, as a UND graduate, as a Mavellonialist (Self-actualized, maverized individuator-anarchists cannot run their cantons unless open-carry or concealed-carry are their natural right and Constitutional right, in no way qualified bit by bit until the right is denied and crushed as sneaky Libs do incrementally--Weinstein is no different.), and as an budding protected class individualist.
Weinstein advises business patrons encountering open-carry patrons in a restaurant and store just to walk out, even not paying their tab. I would like to urge the Tea Party to grow the conservative movement everywhere in strength so that they are the majority in every state and in most counties. That way their counter-boycott would force businesses to side with the gun-loving, gun-toting, gun-bearing majority.
As the society turns more conservative, more patriotic, more gun-living, more embracing of the Mavellonial lifestyle, carrying guns everywhere will be no more noticeable and objectionable than having a smart phone in a carrying case on one's belt. If all everywhere are armed, and a nut is lying and out to kill everyone, let 7 patrons shoot him down before he hurts more than one person. Where all are armed, trained, ready and willing to execute violent felons and crazies, the latter will run for cover most of the time, being the cowards that they are. If some innocent bystanders do get shot in public, that is tragic and regrettable, but gun-toting (almost without restriction) individuator-anarchists need to be armed all the time to be effective citizen soldiers, like the supercitizens they are becoming. Their need to be armed everywhere and anywhere as they see fit is their right, and is a military expression of their virility and power as soldiers. Their liberty outweighs Weinstein's fear for the public good in case open-carry is allowed.
Weinstein denies that restricting the rights of gun-bearers is discriminatory, or that they are a protected group. Actually, the worst and undiscovered discrimination against anyone is against individualists, especially great souls, and I am the one to discover this. None others recognize it. But if the individuator as an individual is to enjoy full liberty to express his role as soldier-citizen and as an empowered voter under natural law and the Constitution, then restricting his right to bear arms is discriminatory against this protected class person. If I want to eat at Dennys in Grand Fork and carry in a semi-automatic rifle with me, it should be the source of alarm and comment by none. Live and live. Liberals use government edicts in the name of the common good to violate the Constitution and deprive the individual citizen of liberty that is not to be abridged in any way whatsoever.
Many totalitarian governments have practice gun control and gun confiscation, and it will happen here if we allow Progressives like Weinstein one inch of regulating our right to bear arms. Illegal and unconstitutional gun control has been waged on the federal, state and municipal level for many decades, so that does show institutional, bureaucratic discrimination against the public's right as individuals to keep and bear arms. We have a right or not. Weinstein's ilk nick the right away a cut at a time, until there is no right.
We cannot trust them, Each and every time we must oppose incremental gun control for what it is: as an attack on the rights and liberties of all Americans.
Weinstein asserts that his gun-control boycott is a rational, calm, safe approach. This is the phony moderation typical of Progressives as they whittle away a right an inch at a time. They are fanatics, ambitious and utterly focused on depriving American individuals of Constitutionally guaranteed liberty. Tell them to jump in the lake. Their motive is not the public good: they want gun control to further extend the territory of the authoritarian state into the shrinking realm of individual liberty. They want pure power over the lives of the people, to instruct and order them about. It should surprise no one that a brilliant professor like Weinstein, a public employee, would seek to expand state power at the expense of private citizen. Passing more illegal, unconstitutional, and immoral laws, at the expense of the private citizen, is the only tune that they ever whistle. Tell them no. No to gun control. No to more excessive lawmaking. No to expanding the government further in our private lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment