I have been writing for five years now about the linkage between frustrated, isolated individualists incompatible with neighbors and society at large, and the very modern recurrence of these individualists resorting to mass murder with guns.
My consistent thesis is that white males per capita are the most individualistic group on earth. I postulate that, as we move forward slowly, painfully and with much clumsiness and bitter, underhanded opposition from vile grouipsts, to making room and legitimate, just accommodation for great souls arising among us, as we move from group-living and non-individuating to individual-living and individuating, those white male and other loner/misfits anywhere are at increased risk to abuse guns and other means to take revenge on an uncaring, hostile society, as they grow angrier and angrier and weary of abuse, snubbing, insults and blatant open discrimination by nonindividuated, group-living herd creatures around them that mistreat them and attack them.
Nothing excuses any individual, anywhere, at any time, to use guns or any other tool to kill oppressors and tormentors, no matter how cruel and brutal they are to him. The cure is not to take guns away from individualists and all Americans. The cure is to allow the maximum allowed number of Americans of all genders and all colors to have plenty of guns, but to train individualists to solve their fights with groupists peacefully, nonviolently. We must train joiners to treat loners and indvidualists with tolerance, equality, acceptance and non-bullying and non-discrimination, so that they can come in and out of group-living as the whim pushes them to act.
With an introduction of all to Mavellonialist training, most of the these social problems would disappear. I will never cede to moral high ground to gun-grabbers to go after individualists as sick, mentally ill people to be denied gun rights.
For a second, let us briefly comment on this vicious, cowardly crazed killer, Kevin Janson Neal, north of San Francisco, his violent outburst, which ended with his execution by peace officers, seems to fit the the pattern laid out in my thesis above. He had guns. He had a long running feud with neighbors. He hated his neighbors and was hate by them. He may have been crazy or sane, or a blend of both, but something needs to be done to break these tragic patterns of societal terror and communal break-downs culminating in senseless, horrifying acts of violence and loss of life.
In the age of the 24 hour news cycle, and before the bodies of the victims are cold in the morgue, liberty-hating, liberty-denying Leftists scream laws must be passed to take away guns, erode personal liberty and expand federal power of the private citizen. Tragedy is their excuse to whip up mass outrage and hysteria to goad a gullible, lost public to act right now, right now to expand federal power with laws that solve nothing. This natural right to keep and bear arms arises for each individual before the Constitution was written, and invalidates any law passed to curb or eliminate private possesion and wielding of guns.
Individualists are to be great-souled soldiers of God, armed to the teeth, with an unalienable natural right to keep and bear arms as private persons. This liberty, this natural right, these human right is not to be eradicated, legislated, denied or hemmed in in any way, for sane, rational adults, by state law or federal law.
If these killers are guilty of domestic violence, are mentally ill or have committed a felony, take away their guns for life.
Now if the person is guilty of non-felonious domestic violence, or commits a nonviolent felony (selling drugs or embezzling), after they pay their debt to society, they should be able to regain their right to bear arms. Not so for the mentally ill, unless they are very certifiably cured of being mentally ill.
Now some say that autism is a form of genetic mental illness, a pathological, psychological state, a genetic or diet-induced or vaccine-induced state of stunted personality development rendering the individual semi-mentally handicapped or a permanent social misfit.
One person went so far as to link being autistic with extreme individualism, suggesting that autistic adults should be denied guns for life. He seemed to imply that radical individualists are sick, autistic adults whose gun rights should be permanently revoked, as with felons and the mentally ill.
This relative of mine wrote this in a Facebook entry about autism and diet: "Autism is occurring with increasing frequency in children. The long term social costs are really high. If a person cannot relate to other people, even semi-normally, some kind of permanent care must be arranged. Of course we could just give them guns and let them shoot up some social situation and get shot in return, which would certainly limit the time society has to care for them."
This relative is a gun-banner and a pure socialist of high intelligence and great communication skill. I believe that he found out about the connection between individualism and autism. That kind of individulism has nothing to do with the wholesome, God-decreed individualism of the maverizing, great soul commanded by God to individuate and to bear arms.
I believe he is suggesting that I am a sick, autistic extreme individualist that needs my guns taken away by the state. If individuals like me cannot relate to other people, even semi-normally, some kind of permanent care must be arranged. So extreme individualists are dangerous, autistic sickos who should have their gun rights illegitimately and unconstitutionally revoked by a tyrannical state whose social workers and bureaucratical psychologists will keep them confined in pscyh wards like they did in the old Soviet Union, or, if out, supervised and ruled by the police, parole officers and court appointeded guardians in charge of the affairs of mentally feeble, irresponsible adults.
So, the victim is blamed once again. Implicit in my thesis is that the state, the groups, the joiners and the Leftists are groupists that non-individuators and discriminators making lost, nonindividuating loners sick to the point of resorting to violent as their last, desperate recorse.
The victimizers and violators of individualists human rights are going to label the individualist as sick, and to be involuntarily declared wards of the state that oppresses them. The state will care for them. This condescending response to my thesis is unworkable and unattractive.
My consistent thesis is that white males per capita are the most individualistic group on earth. I postulate that, as we move forward slowly, painfully and with much clumsiness and bitter, underhanded opposition from vile grouipsts, to making room and legitimate, just accommodation for great souls arising among us, as we move from group-living and non-individuating to individual-living and individuating, those white male and other loner/misfits anywhere are at increased risk to abuse guns and other means to take revenge on an uncaring, hostile society, as they grow angrier and angrier and weary of abuse, snubbing, insults and blatant open discrimination by nonindividuated, group-living herd creatures around them that mistreat them and attack them.
Nothing excuses any individual, anywhere, at any time, to use guns or any other tool to kill oppressors and tormentors, no matter how cruel and brutal they are to him. The cure is not to take guns away from individualists and all Americans. The cure is to allow the maximum allowed number of Americans of all genders and all colors to have plenty of guns, but to train individualists to solve their fights with groupists peacefully, nonviolently. We must train joiners to treat loners and indvidualists with tolerance, equality, acceptance and non-bullying and non-discrimination, so that they can come in and out of group-living as the whim pushes them to act.
With an introduction of all to Mavellonialist training, most of the these social problems would disappear. I will never cede to moral high ground to gun-grabbers to go after individualists as sick, mentally ill people to be denied gun rights.
For a second, let us briefly comment on this vicious, cowardly crazed killer, Kevin Janson Neal, north of San Francisco, his violent outburst, which ended with his execution by peace officers, seems to fit the the pattern laid out in my thesis above. He had guns. He had a long running feud with neighbors. He hated his neighbors and was hate by them. He may have been crazy or sane, or a blend of both, but something needs to be done to break these tragic patterns of societal terror and communal break-downs culminating in senseless, horrifying acts of violence and loss of life.
In the age of the 24 hour news cycle, and before the bodies of the victims are cold in the morgue, liberty-hating, liberty-denying Leftists scream laws must be passed to take away guns, erode personal liberty and expand federal power of the private citizen. Tragedy is their excuse to whip up mass outrage and hysteria to goad a gullible, lost public to act right now, right now to expand federal power with laws that solve nothing. This natural right to keep and bear arms arises for each individual before the Constitution was written, and invalidates any law passed to curb or eliminate private possesion and wielding of guns.
Individualists are to be great-souled soldiers of God, armed to the teeth, with an unalienable natural right to keep and bear arms as private persons. This liberty, this natural right, these human right is not to be eradicated, legislated, denied or hemmed in in any way, for sane, rational adults, by state law or federal law.
If these killers are guilty of domestic violence, are mentally ill or have committed a felony, take away their guns for life.
Now if the person is guilty of non-felonious domestic violence, or commits a nonviolent felony (selling drugs or embezzling), after they pay their debt to society, they should be able to regain their right to bear arms. Not so for the mentally ill, unless they are very certifiably cured of being mentally ill.
Now some say that autism is a form of genetic mental illness, a pathological, psychological state, a genetic or diet-induced or vaccine-induced state of stunted personality development rendering the individual semi-mentally handicapped or a permanent social misfit.
One person went so far as to link being autistic with extreme individualism, suggesting that autistic adults should be denied guns for life. He seemed to imply that radical individualists are sick, autistic adults whose gun rights should be permanently revoked, as with felons and the mentally ill.
This relative of mine wrote this in a Facebook entry about autism and diet: "Autism is occurring with increasing frequency in children. The long term social costs are really high. If a person cannot relate to other people, even semi-normally, some kind of permanent care must be arranged. Of course we could just give them guns and let them shoot up some social situation and get shot in return, which would certainly limit the time society has to care for them."
This relative is a gun-banner and a pure socialist of high intelligence and great communication skill. I believe that he found out about the connection between individualism and autism. That kind of individulism has nothing to do with the wholesome, God-decreed individualism of the maverizing, great soul commanded by God to individuate and to bear arms.
I believe he is suggesting that I am a sick, autistic extreme individualist that needs my guns taken away by the state. If individuals like me cannot relate to other people, even semi-normally, some kind of permanent care must be arranged. So extreme individualists are dangerous, autistic sickos who should have their gun rights illegitimately and unconstitutionally revoked by a tyrannical state whose social workers and bureaucratical psychologists will keep them confined in pscyh wards like they did in the old Soviet Union, or, if out, supervised and ruled by the police, parole officers and court appointeded guardians in charge of the affairs of mentally feeble, irresponsible adults.
So, the victim is blamed once again. Implicit in my thesis is that the state, the groups, the joiners and the Leftists are groupists that non-individuators and discriminators making lost, nonindividuating loners sick to the point of resorting to violent as their last, desperate recorse.
The victimizers and violators of individualists human rights are going to label the individualist as sick, and to be involuntarily declared wards of the state that oppresses them. The state will care for them. This condescending response to my thesis is unworkable and unattractive.
No comments:
Post a Comment