Yes, the right to bear arms is not absolute. I cannot buy a bazooka, a machine gun or a shoulder-fired missile.
Outside of those concessions, the right to bear arms should be nearly absolute with age restrictions, without universal background checks, without bump stock restrictions, without taxing or licensing gun owners, no registration, no confiscation, no authorization of Health Departments to collect data on firearm ownership in order to conduct public health research, no court-issued Gun Violence Protection Orders to restrict individuals who allegedly pose a safety risk from possessing firearms should be seen as incremental steps to grab guns and unduly hamper the right to bear arms.
No to all of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment