Levin The Hater?

I have long been a supporter and admirer of Mark Levin: I am not blind to the fact that he is arrogant, and can have a mean mouth, but, for the most part, I believe he is principled, brilliant, a truth-teller and on the right track. I land firmly on his side with his feud with Tucker Carlson.

My fear is Tucker Carlson is anti-semitic and that he is or is favoring Christian, white nationalism. I worked for Jews so I know them up close, and they are people not saints. Having said that, they are a remarkable people and are God’s chosen people, but that is not a blank check for them to do whatever they want, or that Israel always does the right thing,

Having said that, I insist that anyone, especially a Christian, practicing antisemitism is doing the Devil’s work, for Satan, above all else, wants the Jews wiped out. I love Christians, I love whites, and I love American pride, but I do not want Christian, white nationalism to become the American Nazi movement.

We need to calm down and do all the things that Christian, white conservatives need to do, without forming a Nazi mass movement in America.

For these reasons I support Mark Levin over Tucker Carlson.

Here is the editorial posted (11/17/25)on Townhall.com by Rabbi Michael Barclay on this subject. I coped and pasted the article and will comment on it: “

A Tale of Two Pundits: Tucker Carlson and Mark Levin

Rabbi Michael Barclay | 5:52 PM on November 17, 2025

For years, Mark Levin and Tucker Carlson have been two of the most prominent conservative voices in the public arena. Currently, they are in a feud with each other. Levin has accused Carlson of being an antisemite and “fake Maga,” and Carlson has called Levin “evil.” Both men have been trusted for so many years, and it is important for the conservative movement in America that we take an honest look at each man, their feud, and the truth.

Levin is specific in stating that Tucker Carlson should not be “canceled” but that people should recognize who he really is.  Carlson is actively trying to stop Levin from pointing out objective truths. Carlson recommends that everyone should reject and never become like Mark Levin. Mark Levin points out the hypocrisy and hate that is inherent in the words and actions of Carlson.

In this feud, it is clear to me which side is righteous and which is dangerous. My prayer is that we all recognize the truths about both men, and choose to support the righteousness and biblical foundation of Mark Levin, and not support Tucker Carlson until, with God's help in opening his heart, he recognizes what he has become and changes his words, values, and actions.

Experts

 

Occasionally I read an editorial online in Townhall.com which piques my interest. I have longed complained that educated elites, intellectuals, professors or as Eric Hoffer wrote, men of words, because they are experts in some specialty and may be highly credentialed, they assume that they are smarter than the masses (Their arrogance about their actual, legitimate expertise often closes them to reeving new insights from amateurs, and they assume that they have the right to rule the masses tyrannically, that they are naturally superior, smarter and morally above the inferior, dumber, less moral masses not rational enough as individuals to run their own affairs.

These experts run in cliques, so their expertise is blunted by their groupthinking, their group conformity, and their slavish insistence upon forcing the square shape of their expertise into the round pegs of ideological doctrine which their holy cause is justified by.

They are addicted to and sickened by power lust the power of powerlessness, the insatiable need to run and ruin the lives of all citizens, allowed no room to express themselves, think for themselves, to run their own affairs without elite interference and checkmating.

Experts should be heard, but each of the masses, if we can encourage the majority to grow into and live as anarchist individuating supercitizens, must think for herself and the majority of the supercitizens shall decide whether, to what degree or how they will heed or not heed what experts provide them with.

Here is Amy Curtis with her editorial, posted on 11/18/25: “

This Is Why No One Trusts 'Experts' Anymore

Amy Curtis | November 18, 2025 9:45 AM

This is correct, of course. And no, the "experts" didn't even think of this. Because they're not considering all the outcomes and implications. They have an agenda and are only concerned with what supports that agenda.”

My response: I am of two minds here. Eric Hoffer and Dennis Prager, at various times, have suggested that idealists or experts are well-intentioned, and remain unconcerned and unaware of the disastrous consequences to their reckless, fearlessly implemented changes, making everything worse. They are excused because they ‘mean well.’ Often they do.

Or they do not mean well at all, that they are liars seeking power, destruction and chaos as the most effective tools for creating social panic and stampeding the masses into a totalitarian regime, the real aim of these intellectuals all the time.

Both motives are often at work at the same time, I worry.

Curtis: “

Consent has to be a two-way street, and the "experts" didn't think of this, either.