Democrats Versus Republicans

The political war and cultural war going on in America between Democrats and Republicans, in many ways and on many levels, is the struggle for power and the respective philosophies about wielding power. Democrats are groupists and statists in favor of big public institutions, economic socialism, the welfare state, group living, living within group identities. They favor individuals and businesses being delimited and regulated by government agencies with oversight clout. Republicans, especially the Tea Party Patriots and not the Rinos, espouse that the only big institutions acceptable are private ones (As an anarchist I seek to downsize all institutions as antithetical to a culture of maverization.). Republicans are for personal liberty, with little government regulation and interference in private affairs. Businesses are to be lightly directed and reasonably taxed, nothing more, period. Obama is easily the worst Progressive President ever, and seriously should be impeached. But the Democrats stick together to protect and defend him as doing what they want done. He is never to blame for anything; he is never responsible for anything. They have wrecked this nation, setting up a soft tyrant. They have bankrupted the nation. They cleverly stuck together to gain and hold onto power, like a single party political system in Cuba, but did so paying the price of tanking the nation. Republicans need to Tea Party the whole country, castigating not just Obama but all Democrats as making it possible for him to be impervious to paying for his sins and crimes. Tea Partiers must primary Rinos and turn the country back to its conservative, individualist, free market, constitutional democratic past. Let individualism be blended with Mavellonialism and anarchist individualism with constitutional amendments offered at the local, state and federal levels to start setting up future republican anarchism everywhere. Progressives must surrender and anarchists must convert Republicans into Tea Partiers, a liberal stance attainable and acceptable for the interim--from the Mavellonialist point of view.