Some liberal pastor was blasting Sarah Palin for being pro-life and yet being a staunch gun-rights advocate. She blasted him back. Good for her.
His slovenly logic runs something like this: if one is anti-abortion, declaring that one affirms life as does God the Author of all that is good, then it follows that one cannot consistently or without hypocratical double standards be pro-gun because guns are used to kill people and defenseless creatures in nature.
My rebuttal: I am more pro-life than pro-choice in my stance on abortion, and I definitely adhere to the concept that a lover of and follower of the Good Spirits would be pro-life.
Along those lines, if one is pro-life, then he wants to see it done that the life of every adult is lived to the fullest as she maverizes all her life. To make these achievable, it is required that she is armed to the teeth, to keep criminals, predators, foreign invaders and federal forces from grabbing her guns, her property and her liberty all in the name of the common good, centralizing all power and wealth under a totalitarian creep like Obama.
The good are not pacifists although they are peaceful and just as long as the rule of law and civil society are in effect across the land and in their community. Just in case, they will stay armed to the teeth because freedom is not free, and life though precious, often must be protected by wielding guns and violent force in this wicked world of ours.
No comments:
Post a Comment