Libertarians have much to recommend to the voter: maximum personal liberty, and minimum government. Live and let live, and to not grab the hard-earned wealth of another.
LIbertarians seem to be rather blah and without strong ethics critical for building a generation of sturdy, moral citizens able to grab and manage personal liberty. I do not sense, in their too relativist, nonjudgmental moral standard, a concept of personal evil and how that impacts the enjoyment of personal liberty, that desirable, ideal and sought after personal ambition.
God exists. Satan exists. Humans are basically evil, with little free will, and are enslaved biologically and by institutional conspiracy to run in packs, and to serve as serfs, minions and cannon fodder for the forces of darkness that have always ruled this world.
How then do we free our people, and let them go to enjoy that state of precious liberty that is their natural right, and God's choice for them?
First, we offer them, under a free market system and a constitutional republic--with a constitution not unlike the superb American Constitution--a life of anarchist individuation.
This style of government under a profit economy and very limited federal government will maximize personal liberty, while minimizing federal, centralized encroachment into citizen lives.
Second, we offer a spiritual plan for citizens. We develop and nurture what reason, what good-souledness and what free will as they can muster so they may manage, grow and guide, by logical, personal decision-making.
Third, group-living is evil more than not, and it keeps people yoked together so that they cannot exercise their potential for personal liberty.
We must offer people the social rewards powerful enough to make them dare live as individuals apart from the group. Individual living is more good than not, and it is where the libertarian citizen of the future will best be able to live as a freed citizen.
No comments:
Post a Comment