When someone holds forth with a new idea or a new way of doing things, often the introduction is pooh-poohed, ignored, suppressed or not even widely known due to a lack of powerful intercessors.
The harbinger is rejected as a fringe kook. But is he and how can we know the difference between a wise heralder of the new versus a nut job pedaling a dangerous or ineffective adjustment in how to do things? There are no easy answers to these questions. I have some suggestions, though, that may help.
First, intellectuals should be receptive to change advocates from all walks of life. Is there any evidence or research that backs up their claim, or refutes it. Check all claims out before embracing them. Is there a historical parallel for what the kook is offering? How did the ancient Chinese incorporate similar changes and what was the outcome? Does the kook proffer violent or authoritarian means to gain his end? If he does, reject him, for a bad means fouls the delivery of even a good idea.
Follow your instincts--does he seem smart, kind, wise and lucky? If he does not, be reserved. Even if his idea seems advantageous, sit on adapting it for a few days; When the dust has settled, if it is such a superior way to go, that should be more evident.
What motivates him? Is it love of reform or truth? Is he a rampant ideologue out to gain power, and avenge himself upon humanity? If he is the latter, run for your life.
This list is not exhaustive, but I hope it helps.
No comments:
Post a Comment