It would seem, that as an epistemological moderate, I am a skeptic regarding the universal applicability of Aristotle's three laws of thought.
A pure subjectivist (total skeptic or solipsist) completely refutes them. Stirner, the severe nominalist, is not quite so skeptical. I am actually an objective idealist more than a subjective materialist, but I am both, so my degree of skepticism about the three laws of thought is not total. I believe that still apply or regulate mostly what is spoken, thought or how Reason permeates the entire world.
No comments:
Post a Comment