Picking On Good Loners

 

The tendency and strong impulse, on the part of joiners and clique members to pick on individuals and loners inside their group, or on the border of their group, is an instinctive, archetypal, immortal behavior pattern and set of games going back thousands of years.

 

This goes on within family units too. Familial and social pack discrimination against loners in its group or marginally part of the group.

 

It may be somewhat forgivable to discriminate against mean, unpleasant, asocial or criminal or very selfish loners in the pack, but, too often—perhaps in the majority of the instances of group picking on the loner--the loner is a good loner, not a bad loner.

 

In that case, it should be verboten to discriminate against a good loner because he should be rewarded and praised not denounced and persecuted for bettering himself, an advantage for him directly, and indirectly for the whole community.

 

Groupists discriminate against loners in their midst because the loner is rebelling, not thinking talking and doing what everyone does, and refuses to accept his bottom-rung ranking and lack of popularity in the clique as assigned by the leadership of the clique. He is to be a whipping boy forever, and this is natural group behavior, satanic, wicked and needs to be called out and ended. The victimizers must publicly take ownership of their wrongdoing, and pledge to commit it no more.

 

In a community or society of loners and individuators, these social and institutional classes and sadomasochistic assigning class and popularity status to each individual would largely cease with the introduction of individual-living as the primary social arrangement, and group-living and a second level of priority as social living set ups.

 

Cliques and families set up these destructive patterns of discrimination against good loners, and these patterns are permanent and unalterable as people go to their graves clinging to their cherished biases. Individuals and individuators, and these biases are easily assumed by each  new generations of  pack discriminators who have no issues with adopting their parents’ socially established biases and identified whipping boys.