Monday, November 24, 2014

Compromsing The Right Way

Obama and the statists are lying in a big way. They claim that government will work again and gridlock will disappear if Republicans and conservatives just meet Obama half way, to get things done.

In terms of raw compromising, those on both sides of a dispute, if negotiating in good faith, agree to about meet in the middle, both sides giving a little. That would b admirable if Obama, chastened after a rejection mandate this November, would pull a Bill Clinton and meet the Republicans in the middle. That did not happen. He and the Democrats are fanatics, doubling down, bent on transforming America into a European-fashioned, socialist democracy. Only, they are now utterly corrupt, and seek to install a Marxist, one-party dictatorship, flooding the country with 50 million foreigners to vote socialist in overwhelming numbers. That way they Californize the country for generations. They are cunning, I will grant them that.

The Left are fanatics. They despise the American Way, and they do not disguise their loathing for it. Obama promised hopelessness and nightmarish change, and he is delivering on his promise. The Left is ecstatic. He is the first black President. He is building Ameritopia right now, and his victory is almost complete. From Mark Levin's perch, he has announced the unmaking of America, a post-constitutional society. The Left is thrilled: not only has Obama fulfilled their wildest dreams, but he is setting himself and future Left-leaning Presidents up as dictators to protect their gains, and further move us towards hardcore Communism.

Now the good person is moderate. The moderate person is to compromise in life and politics with neighbors and other citizens. God commands us to so act.

My question is: how can I be such a solid, staunch conservative, and yet believe in compromise? The liberals, if they knew of my existence, would accuse me of hypocrisy, dishonesty and fanaticism. Without my defining my terms, and explaining how conservative moderation works, I would be a liar, dishonest, a hypocrite and a fanatic. I am none of these. I tell the truth most of the time. My political and ethical philosophies are roughly consistent. I am honest. I am not a hypocrite. I may sound fanatical but I am a moderate. I am a militant moderate when holding the line against fanatics of all ilks, but that does not make me a fanatic. If I use totalitarian means to suppress them, then the bad means would have pulled me over to the dark side, into fanaticism, demonic cruelty and intolerance. It is tricky to distinguish and avoid but I think I know the difference, and can remain an honorable moderate. Conducting holy war can corrupt any of us, including me, so we must constantly be on guard not to become what we oppose. Satan is very tricky and slippery, like Sauron, and we are easily swayed, deceived, misled and conquered by evil forces.

I am a solid conservative. The world needs constitutional republicanism with canton-anarchism as the national political arrangement. To make this state come about, free enterprise must be the national economic system. Small government and small institutions of all kinds is a must. The vast majority, to make the system work, must refuse to live in groups any more, but live instead as private, free, individuating individuals in each her own canton residence or small plantation.

By deinstitutionalizing and degrouping society, the conservative need for efficient, humane societal structures are met. This good means for how to live eliminates bad means to achieve reforms. Moderate means create good ends, and provide and undergird the canton life, the individual existences and the self-actualizing that allow men and women to live as free angels, building, enjoying and extending the reach of the high civilization.

Bad means fanaticize the undertaking and always turn it evil. To achieve a goal as members of groups, by growing government or attacking the problem via institutions, these are the liberal means that bring and perpetuate evil in the world.

Once liberals and independents come to comprehend that life is difficult and good intentions are not enough, we conservatives have a chance of working with them. Unintended consequences have been disastrous, and inflicted horrible damage on our country. We must listen to God and learn what to do and how to proceed.

So with that moderate conservative structure of compromise in place, the good means of living under a constitutional-republic as free enterprise individuators being the upgraded American Way, then conservatives can and should compromise with reformers--radical, liberal, middling, conservative and reactionary--and allow them to see their reforms fulfilled and implemented within the proper political and economic structure. That is they should go to the neighborhood, weekly meetings and offer up their reform, and allow individuated supercitizens to vote up or down to push the reform for the community, the county, the state, the nation or the world. Reasonable proposals will be heard and honored, if the initial compromise is met on how to set up the reform.


No comments:

Post a Comment